Evan Williams, the (co?) founder of Twitter, Medium, and our own Blogger has recently apoligised for something.
That something, as per the Indian Express is:
I have nothing to say about Donald Trump or America: because I am not an American. You know, not my zoo, not my animals. Secondly, he won in an election and not a civil war! Thirdly, how can we be sure that Twitter was the tipping point?
I do have an issue with Evan apologising, though.
I strongly think that he or anyone else does not have to apoligise for making something good. Lots of people, companies, governments, celebrities, schools, NGOs and others communicate via Twitter. I am sure most of these communications are positive.
It is also possible that Twitter might be used for illegal and immoral activities. If that is true, Evan might want to apoligise for it as well. That is certainly his choice. But I strongly think it is not required.
Moreover, do we think if Twitter was not there, this electoral result would be any different? There are many, many websites and services and apps and whatnot. Twitter was just the easiest medium at that time to reach lotsof people!
Looks like Evan's guilt is only for the fact that he made a great website. I would be happy to make a tenth of the impact he has had on the world!
That something, as per the Indian Express is:
It’s a very bad thing, Twitter’s role in that. If it’s true that he wouldn’t be president if it weren’t for Twitter, then yeah, I’m sorry
I have nothing to say about Donald Trump or America: because I am not an American. You know, not my zoo, not my animals. Secondly, he won in an election and not a civil war! Thirdly, how can we be sure that Twitter was the tipping point?
I do have an issue with Evan apologising, though.
I strongly think that he or anyone else does not have to apoligise for making something good. Lots of people, companies, governments, celebrities, schools, NGOs and others communicate via Twitter. I am sure most of these communications are positive.
It is also possible that Twitter might be used for illegal and immoral activities. If that is true, Evan might want to apoligise for it as well. That is certainly his choice. But I strongly think it is not required.
Moreover, do we think if Twitter was not there, this electoral result would be any different? There are many, many websites and services and apps and whatnot. Twitter was just the easiest medium at that time to reach lotsof people!
Looks like Evan's guilt is only for the fact that he made a great website. I would be happy to make a tenth of the impact he has had on the world!